October 6, 2005 Oakland, CA Good Morning. My name is Melody Steeples, and I'm here representing
CANNACT - the California Association of Nutrition Network Activists. We are
an emerging membership association representing the interests of
California’s FSNE providers and the low income clients we serve. I believe we all share a vision where making healthy food choices
and being physically active is easy to do and the normative behavior.
California has been making good headway in this direction, due in large
part to FSNE funding. Thanks to FSNE funding: §
low income Californians who have been part of FSNE
activities are eating more servings of fruits and vegetables than their
unexposed counterparts; §
vending machines in public places around the state are
now offering healthier choices; §
jurisdictions around the state are seeking ways to be
more pedestrian and bicycle friendly; §
food stamp recipients can use their EBT food stamp
benefits to shop at farmers markets in many communities around California; §
more low income families are applying for food stamps
because they’ve learned that food stamp benefits could enable them to buy
more fruits and vegetables and other healthful foods; and §
many more California schools with high numbers of low
income students became early adopters of junk food restrictions on their
campuses. We were pleased to see that the USDA’s new Food Stamp Nutrition Education Guiding Principles encourages “behavior
change models that include intervention strategies at individual,
organizational /institutional and societal levels. FNS recognizes the
potential impact of environmental factors, including institution policy,
neighborhood design, food access and advertising on eating and physical
activity behaviors.” But we were very disappointed
to see that the USDA has established new policy that such activities are “beyond the scope” of FSNE. It is
these very activities that have allowed California’s FSNE projects to
achieve its noteworthy results. We are looking forward to
working with the USDA, committed stakeholders, and our Congressional representatives
on the Farm Bill-- and other legislative vehicles -- to achieve both
nutrition assistance and nutrition policy that bring us closer to our
vision. We are planning to work toward: §
Codification of program regulations to ensure FSNE
can reach all those families in low-income communities that might be
eligible for Food Stamps.
CANNACT Comments at the USDA
HealthierUS Forum
October 6, 2005
Page 2
§
Including certified, likely and potentially-eligible
Food Stamp households, defined as those with incomes up to 185 percent of the
Federal Poverty Level (FPL), in FSNE-allowable activities.
§
Authorizing local FSNE programs to make effective use
of evidence-based approaches to target low-income populations including
community development, policy, systems, and environmental change, and media
advocacy, public relations, marketing and promotion – as well as traditional
education.
§
Enabling local FSNE programs to work in many different
community locations that reach high proportions of FSNE-eligible persons where
they live, work and play, and where food and physical activity decisions are
made. Nearly two-thirds of
FSNE-eligible adults live outside low-income census tracts that currently
qualify for FSNE.
§
Removing administrative “silos” that exist between USDA
nutrition programs, which hampers efficient and creative nutrition education efforts
that partner with and complement federal food program outreach. This
targeted approach enhances the potential for positive behavior change and
should be encouraged, not prohibited.
§
Enabling programs to implement comprehensive FSNE
programs that include effective physical activity and community food security
interventions, as well as those for healthy eating, and address the community barriers that FSNE-eligible population
faces in making healthy choices.
§
Redirection of commodity support payments to create a
retail-based mechanism to provide participants in the Food Stamp Program (FSP)
with monetary incentives to purchase health-promoting foods such as
minimally-processed fruits, vegetables, and whole-grain products, potentially
increasing the purchasing power of food stamp benefits by over 50%.
In an age where calories are cheap, but good nutrition remains relatively expensive, all levels of government need to respond in a way that supports the most vulnerable in our society to achieve optimal nutrition and prevent diet-related disease. We must move away from this depression-era notion that “it’s too expensive” to ensure good nutrition for all Americans, and recognize that the opposite is true – it’s too expensive to ignore the increasing dominance of a junk food culture and the ill-health it breeds.
Sincerely,
Melody W. Steeples, MPH, RD
Acting Director
California Association of Nutrition Network Activists (CANNACT)